Jump to content
nuked

New Rules for NSW cyclists

Recommended Posts

A lot of junctions in the UK have 'bike boxes' at the front (and to the side), gives the bikes a head start and allows cars to right to the line. Seems to work ok.

Yes, a lot of intersections in NSW with a red light, it is legal to turn left once stopped at the red. Woronora Rd and the Princes Highway at Engadine is one such example. Some of the most progressive laws in the world, I think cities like Paris have recently followed what has been in place in NSW for years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, a lot of intersections in NSW with a red light, it is legal to turn left once stopped at the red. Woronora Rd and the Princes Highway at Engadine is one such example. Some of the most progressive laws in the world, I think cities like Paris have recently followed what has been in place in NSW for years.

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, a lot of intersections in NSW with a red light, it is legal to turn left once stopped at the red. Woronora Rd and the Princes Highway at Engadine is one such example. Some of the most progressive laws in the world, I think cities like Paris have recently followed what has been in place in NSW for years.

Gottem in SA and Vic too. Farm towns to big cities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have any of the haters set up a lobby group re banning bells and reflectors ? Whilst those are old laws, if the jacks are going to enforce them in burbs, probably should get them removed.

 

TriNSW ? Cycling NSW ? Bicycle NSW ? Anyone of those peak groups doing anything to change the law as opposed to complaining over the equity of penalties.

 

CNSW agreed to the legislation. It was an appalling sell out decision and I made my displeasure known to them. I cannot believe the Board approved it. BNSW were involved in discussions with the government in the lead up as well but they clearly missed something along the way and have seemingly been actively lobbying against much of it ever since it was announced. I've no idea about TriNSW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Errrrr. ... I get all the commentary on induction loops etc but wouldn't it just be easier to move forward 3 feet then care can move up and trigger the lights.

 

I used to do this often, but my experience was many drivers were reluctant to creep forward, even when motioned to do so. On roads I used to regularly ride, I'd say there were about a dozen to 15 sets of lights that would never trigger. I'd report them but it never seemed to make much difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On roads I used to regularly ride, I'd say there were about a dozen to 15 sets of lights that would never trigger. I'd report them but it never seemed to make much difference.

I can't even comprehend that. I used to do a regular 100km ride finishing in the CBD. There was not a single light on that route that didn't trigger. Somebody brought 1 to my attention on this forum that was on my route, but a turn lane I didn't use, I reported it and it was fixed a week later. Maybe it's the area you ride?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AA7. I understand the frustration however....... If you just picked up your car and had to drive the same distance home without a seatbelt, you would expect a fine if caught. To me there is not too much difference - a safety law.

 

FM

I wasn't complaining, just noting the story I saw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Still need to place the bike in the right position for it to work though, so might need a bit of moving the bike forwards / backwards / sideways.

 

Some intersections have the same problems for motorbikes, I used to commute past one intersection where giving the starter motor a turn used to trigger the sequence

Yeah. Quite often my Postie bike doesn't set off the lights and I get honked at. I just sit at the lights until a car triggers the other side. It is scary how angry drivers get because the postie is not setting off the lights. I try to avoid those intersections now. Look for smaller roads with no traffic lights. Not always an option though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

CNSW agreed to the legislation. It was an appalling sell out decision and I made my displeasure known to them. I cannot believe the Board approved it. BNSW were involved in discussions with the government in the lead up as well but they clearly missed something along the way and have seemingly been actively lobbying against much of it ever since it was announced. I've no idea about TriNSW

 

I'm convinced the boards of the "peak" cycling groups don't actually ride bikes, or at least not on the roads most cyclists actually are on. Especially after finding out said groups approved the present M2 cycling diversion.... which by any measure has roads in it no sane cyclist would want to use. They could not possibly be active riders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't even comprehend that. I used to do a regular 100km ride finishing in the CBD. There was not a single light on that route that didn't trigger. Somebody brought 1 to my attention on this forum that was on my route, but a turn lane I didn't use, I reported it and it was fixed a week later. Maybe it's the area you ride?

 

Well I'm not riding any more at present, so that was my experience from some years ago, perhaps they are better now. My point was that it is and can be a real issue in some places.

 

The roads here have simply become too hostile. For me at least. It got to the point that not a ride would go by without my life being threatened at least once by the deliberate or inadvertent action of a motor vehicle driver, despite seeking out the best routes and time of day to avoid such situations as much as possible. Ironically it was my choice of using a bikeway than the normal road route that resulted in my accident and leg amputation in 2007. I think it was only the absolutely burning desire to not let that stop me from riding/racing that saw me through to end of season 2010/11.

 

Call it cumulative trauma fatigue. I hit a breaking point after then when my strong desire to ride/train a lot and be fit and race no longer outweighed the crap we put up with in this environment. And what makes it worse is that when you are not fit, it gets more dangerous.

 

The only occasional ride I do now is in the safe haven of Centennial Park, which has been the location of a multiple police blitzes of late, because you know cyclists are a massive threat to society in there, those guys without bells on their bikes who dare ride on the road, they need to be dealt with. The city has lost the plot.

 

I'm moving away from Sydney and won't have traffic lights or many angry idiots to deal with where I'm going.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'm convinced the boards of the "peak" cycling groups don't actually ride bikes, or at least not on the roads most cyclists actually are on. Especially after finding out said groups approved the present M2 cycling diversion.... which by any measure has roads in it no sane cyclist would want to use. They could not possibly be active riders.

I'm guessing your referring to the temporary detour route that was required due to all the road works being done to widen the M2 a couple of years ago?

 

The cycle groups complained that it would take them additional time to ride (rather ironic that argument). Complaints of dangerous conditions etc.

 

I rode that route plenty of times and like any bike path, road crossing, narrow portion etc. you ride to conditions. When that was done it was not dangerous at all (but it did take longer than straight down the M2). If you want to ride a footpath at 30-40km/h, well........ you know what's going to happen!

 

Again that was a temporary mountain made from a temporary mole hill.

 

To have stayed on the M2 whilst that work was being done would have been a complete death trap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm guessing your referring to the temporary detour route that was required due to all the road works being done to widen the M2 a couple of years ago?

 

The cycle groups complained that it would take them additional time to ride (rather ironic that argument). Complaints of dangerous conditions etc.

 

I rode that route plenty of times and like any bike path, road crossing, narrow portion etc. you ride to conditions. When that was done it was not dangerous at all (but it did take longer than straight down the M2). If you want to ride a footpath at 30-40km/h, well........ you know what's going to happen!

 

Again that was a temporary mountain made from a temporary mole hill.

 

To have stayed on the M2 whilst that work was being done would have been a complete death trap.

 

No, it is the current diversion that has just started between Pennant Hills Road and Windsor Road. That funnels bikes onto North Rocks Road, where you have to swing in and out of parked cars and risk being doored at high speed unless you are fast enough to hold your own in 60kph traffic. The longer distance is not a problem. The issue is the utter stupidity of a alt route that will get someone hurt or killed - clearly no one who rides tested this route.

 

It's unsafe and badly thought out - when the so called "dangerous" rejected by cycling lobbyist route has been discovered to actually be considerably safer, albeit with a 22% short climb. Some work on Renown would have made for a very good alt to the M2 with no issues of getting your face smashed in by a door or trying to cut in and out of faster traffic. I've also found three other routes - longer but also considerably safer to say the least.

 

If I dont feel like tackling Renown, I have enough legit concerns about the official route that I deliberately detour ANOTHER 3km to avoid it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

No, it is the current diversion that has just started between Pennant Hills Road and Windsor Road. That funnels bikes onto North Rocks Road,

Haven't seen that detour. Doesn't sound to hot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just tried to put a bell on Mrs T's roadie. The handlebars are too thick for the bracket to fit. If asked, she's just going to say 'ding ding' very loudly....or I'll break out the gaffa tape or something.

 

However her MTB now has a beaut old bell taken off our daughters old bike :sleepy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just tried to put a bell on Mrs T's roadie. The handlebars are too thick for the bracket to fit. If asked, she's just going to say 'ding ding' very loudly....or I'll break out the gaffa tape or something.

Â

However her MTB now has a beaut old bell taken off our daughters old bike :sleepy:

Mount it under the seat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Dunc,

 

Nice to know that you are being seen as the stupid turd you are in other parts of the world

 

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/australia-newzealand/article4702991.ece?shareToken=1298fee7486458ef42efe861bdd2e234

Only a little bit of journalistic licence with the truth. :)

Edited by Ex-Hasbeen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having an interest in electronics, and cycling, I've been thinking about easy ways to trigger the lights but haven't found any on my routes that my bike (and it is carbon) doesn't trigger. Does anybody know of any in the NW area of Brisbane that don't trigger that I can experiment on?

Thanks

Couldn't get the lights to change in the turning lane from south pine road into Griffith street at Everton Park. Had to get off and walk through two pedestrian crossings to start riding again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ummm. Why is it in the cycle lane ... ??

(Am I being too old and cranky again?? )

Edited by Mjainoz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Except any cyclist would have to move into the traffic lane to avoid the sign.

 

Some arent so smart eh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not riden at home since the laws came in. When I do, I'll need to comply whether I like it or not.

 

Here in the UAE, the extent of cycling tracks has continued to increase and given the speed at which people drive on the road, more people are using them.

 

When I say cycling tracks, I mean proper tracks. They are generally used by serious cyclists who no longer want to take the chance riding on the road and can do safe, beneficial sessions on the track.

 

There is Al Qudra in Dubai and Al Wathba here in Abu Dhabi. Al Wathba has an 8k, 16k, 20k, 22k and 30k loop. All with 2 lanes around 3m wide, lines marked and with the 8k and 16k fully lit. Coffee and bike shops and toilet block with hot showers.

 

Initially I was hesitant as my mindset was " why drive 45 mins to ride?" After using the facilities a few times my attitude has changed. Sessions are stress free and no worrying about cars with drivers texting, trucks and buses running you down. No stopping at lights.

Drive out, ride, shower and coffee, drive home....simple.

 

My point...well, Australia is a big country. I'm sure there is enough space within an hours drive from most major cities where governments could build something similar for cyclists to use. Even if you had to pay $10.

Am I dreaming or are there just no votes in it?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×